SIR PHILIP FORUM

  • Contact seen
Basic profileother

@sirphilipforum on Telegram · last 90 days

Reach out

Ways to reach

  • WhatsAppSign in to see itseen 2 Sept 2026 · from telegram-public-preview · not confirmed yet
  • PhoneSign in to see itseen 2 Sept 2026 · from telegram-public-preview · not confirmed yet
Start free to reach out

Signed in, the profile inside Dossiary opens a panel with every way to reach them and keeps the conversation in one place.

At a glance

  • SIR PHILIP FORUM has 11,800 followers on Telegram as @sirphilipforum, observed 2 Sept 2026 with medium confidence.
  • Over the last 90 days, @sirphilipforum published 17 posts; posts averaged 165 views and the engagement rate cannot be worked out from what is on file.
  • Dossiary files this creator under other.
  • No price is on file for this creator, and nothing in the record supports an estimate.

Overview

One card per account. Growth is measured from the observation the period opened on; a number never observed stays a dash.

@sirphilipforumTelegram

17 posts · last posted 1 Sept 2026

Followers
11.8K
Growth
0
Avg views
165.2
Avg engagement
Eng. rate
Posts / month
5.7

Numbers over the last 90 days. Hover a number to see where it comes from.

Audience signals

Six things we can work out from the numbers on file for the last 90 days, each set against a published reference range. A band is a comparison, not a grade: there is no score here, no fake-follower percentage and no audience demographics, because the record does not hold what those would need. How the ranges were chosen.

@sirphilipforumTelegram

0 of 17 posts carry engagement numbers

Fewer than 5 posts with engagement numbers in the last 90 days, so the signals read from posts say so rather than guess. Widen the period to read more.

  • Engagement for the size

    not known

    Not enough observed posts to say

    Average engagement per post Followers 11.8Kobserved

    How this is worked out

    Average likes, comments and shares per post divided by followers, placed against the reference band for this platform and follower size.

  • Followers to following

    not known

    The following count was never observed, so there is no ratio to read.

    Followers 11.8KFollowing observed

    How this is worked out

    Followers divided by the accounts this one follows, from the latest observation; under 1 is the unusual shape for a creator.

  • Comments per like

    not known

    Not enough observed posts to say

    Comments, summed Likes, summed not observed yet

    How this is worked out

    Comments divided by likes, summed across the posts in the period where both were observed.

  • Short-video reach

    not known

    Not enough observed posts to say

    Average views per short video Followers 11.8Kobserved

    How this is worked out

    Average views on short videos in the period divided by followers, against the reference band for this platform.

  • Posting rhythm

    above typical

    Posting comes in bursts: gaps vary by 0.5 days around a 0.3 days average.

    Average gap between posts 0.3 daysSpread of the gaps 0.5 daysfrom 17 postsobserved

    How this is worked out

    The spread (standard deviation) of the gaps between consecutive posts in the period, in days; the band compares that spread with the average gap.

  • Posts with numbers

    below typical

    Engagement numbers were observed on only 0 of 17 posts (0.00%), so the rows above read a thin sample.

    Posts with an engagement number 0Posts in the period 17from 17 postsobserved

    How this is worked out

    The share of posts in the period on which at least one engagement number was observed — how much of the record the rows above are reading.

Formats

@sirphilipforum

FormatPostsShareAvg viewsEng. rate
Image1482%150.6
Video212%243
Carousel16%213

Shares are of every post in the period, so they always add up to the whole — picking one format narrows the numbers above, never this mix.

Posts

The posts behind the numbers above, ranked three ways. A post with a number we never observed is left out of that ranking rather than counted as zero.

Most engagement

Nothing on file to rank this way.

Most views

  1. 255 views· engagementVideo

    No caption on file

    Open the posttelegram-public-preview

  2. 231 views· engagementVideo

    No caption on file

    Open the posttelegram-public-preview

  3. 229 views· engagementImage

    No caption on file

    Open the posttelegram-public-preview

  4. 219 views· engagementImage

    No caption on file

    Open the posttelegram-public-preview

  5. 213 views· engagementCarousel

    No caption on file

    Open the posttelegram-public-preview

Most recent

  1. 120 views· engagementImage

    No caption on file

    Open the posttelegram-public-preview

  2. 97 views· engagementImage

    No caption on file

    Open the posttelegram-public-preview

  3. 92 views· engagementImage

    No caption on file

    Open the posttelegram-public-preview

  4. 92 views· engagementImage

    No caption on file

    Open the posttelegram-public-preview

  5. 138 views· engagementImage

    No caption on file

    Open the posttelegram-public-preview

Price

Price

No price on file: this creator has not set a rate card, and the record holds no deal to read one from. Nothing here supports an estimate, so we do not show one.

History

@sirphilipforum

  1. 11,800
  2. 11,800
  3. 11,800

Every observation is kept; nothing here is overwritten.