@onosky5Instagram
4 of 4 posts carry engagement numbers
Engagement for the size—not knownHow this is worked out
Not enough observed posts to say
- Average engagement per post
- 162.8
- Followers
- 149K
from 4 postsobserved
Average likes, comments and shares per post divided by followers, placed against the reference band for this platform and follower size.
Followers to following93.6×typicalHow this is worked out
Followed by 93.6× the accounts it follows, as creator accounts usually are.
- Followers
- 149K
- Following
- 1.6K
observed
Followers divided by the accounts this one follows, from the latest observation; under 1 is the unusual shape for a creator.
Comments per like—not knownHow this is worked out
Not enough observed posts to say
- Comments, summed
- 12
- Likes, summed
- 461
from 1 postobserved
Comments divided by likes, summed across the posts in the period where both were observed.
Short-video reach—not knownHow this is worked out
Not enough observed posts to say
- Average views per short video
- —
- Followers
- 149K
observed
Average views on short videos in the period divided by followers, against the reference band for this platform.
Posting rhythmVariation between posts—not knownHow this is worked out
Not enough observed posts to say
- Average gap between posts
- 8.4 days
- Spread of the gaps
- 5.6 days
from 4 postsobserved
The spread (standard deviation) of the gaps between consecutive posts in the period, in days; the band compares that spread with the average gap.
Posts with numbers100%typicalHow this is worked out
Engagement numbers were observed on 4 of 4 posts (100%).
- Posts with an engagement number
- 4
- Posts in the period
- 4
from 4 postsobserved
The share of posts in the period on which at least one engagement number was observed — how much of the record the rows above are reading.
Limited post data
Fewer than 5 posts with engagement numbers in the last 90 days, so the signals read from posts say so rather than guess. Widen the period to read more.
