@nastyblaqTikTok
5 posts · last posted 23 Aug 2026
- Followers
- 4.3M
- Growth
- —
- Avg views
- 1.1M
- Avg engagement
- 265.8K
- Eng. rate
- 6.2%
- Posts / month
- 1.7
Numbers over the last 90 days. Hover a number to see where it comes from.
@nastyblaq on TikTok · last 90 days
Reach out
Ways to reach
No public way to reach this creator has been seen yet. You can still open their account and send the message yourself.
Start free to reach out
Signed in, the profile inside Dossiary opens a panel with every way to reach them and keeps the conversation in one place.
At a glance
- Nasty Blaq has 4,300,000 followers on TikTok as @nastyblaq, observed 3 Sept 2026 with high confidence.
- Over the last 90 days, @nastyblaq published 5 posts; posts averaged 1,120,920 views and the engagement rate was 6.2%.
- Dossiary files this creator under skits.
- No price is on file for this creator, and nothing in the record supports an estimate.
Overview
One card per account. Growth is measured from the observation the period opened on; a number never observed stays a dash.
Audience signals
Six things we can work out from the numbers on file for the last 90 days, each set against a published reference range. A band is a comparison, not a grade: there is no score here, no fake-follower percentage and no audience demographics, because the record does not hold what those would need. How the ranges were chosen.
@nastyblaqTikTok
5 of 5 posts carry engagement numbers
Engagement for the size
above typicalEngagement is above what is typical for an account this size on TikTok.
Average engagement per post 265.8KFollowers 4.3MTypical range, low 2.0%Typical range, high 6.0%from 5 postsobserved
How this is worked out
Average likes, comments and shares per post divided by followers, placed against the reference band for this platform and follower size.
Followers to following
typicalFollowed by 12464× the accounts it follows, as creator accounts usually are.
Followers 4.3MFollowing 345observed
How this is worked out
Followers divided by the accounts this one follows, from the latest observation; under 1 is the unusual shape for a creator.
Comments per like
typicalComments per like are typical (0.78%).
Comments, summed 10.3KLikes, summed 1.3MTypical range, low 0.50%Typical range, high 10%from 5 postsobserved
How this is worked out
Comments divided by likes, summed across the posts in the period where both were observed.
Short-video reach
typicalShort videos reach about 26% of the follower count in views — typical on TikTok.
Average views per short video 1.1MFollowers 4.3MTypical range, low 0.1×Typical range, high 2.0×from 5 postsobserved
How this is worked out
Average views on short videos in the period divided by followers, against the reference band for this platform.
Posting rhythm
typicalPosting rhythm is typical: gaps vary by about 6.9 days around a 8.6 days average.
Average gap between posts 8.6 daysSpread of the gaps 6.9 daysfrom 5 postsobserved
How this is worked out
The spread (standard deviation) of the gaps between consecutive posts in the period, in days; the band compares that spread with the average gap.
Posts with numbers
typicalEngagement numbers were observed on 5 of 5 posts (100%).
Posts with an engagement number 5Posts in the period 5from 5 postsobserved
How this is worked out
The share of posts in the period on which at least one engagement number was observed — how much of the record the rows above are reading.
Formats
@nastyblaq
| Format | Posts | Share | Avg views | Eng. rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short video | 5 | 100% | 1.1M | 6.2% |
Shares are of every post in the period, so they always add up to the whole — picking one format narrows the numbers above, never this mix.
Posts
The posts behind the numbers above, ranked three ways. A post with a number we never observed is left out of that ranking rather than counted as zero.
Most engagement
1.5M views·376.6K engagementShort video
No caption on file
Open the postbrightdata:web_data_tiktok_profiles
1.3M views·263.9K engagementShort video
No caption on file
Open the postbrightdata:web_data_tiktok_profiles
704.6K views·246.2K engagementShort video
No caption on file
Open the postbrightdata:web_data_tiktok_profiles
1.1M views·229K engagementShort video
No caption on file
Open the postbrightdata:web_data_tiktok_profiles
1M views·213.2K engagementShort video
No caption on file
Open the postbrightdata:web_data_tiktok_profiles
Most views
1.5M views·376.6K engagementShort video
No caption on file
Open the postbrightdata:web_data_tiktok_profiles
1.3M views·263.9K engagementShort video
No caption on file
Open the postbrightdata:web_data_tiktok_profiles
1.1M views·229K engagementShort video
No caption on file
Open the postbrightdata:web_data_tiktok_profiles
1M views·213.2K engagementShort video
No caption on file
Open the postbrightdata:web_data_tiktok_profiles
704.6K views·246.2K engagementShort video
No caption on file
Open the postbrightdata:web_data_tiktok_profiles
Most recent
1.1M views·229K engagementShort video
No caption on file
Open the postbrightdata:web_data_tiktok_profiles
1.5M views·376.6K engagementShort video
No caption on file
Open the postbrightdata:web_data_tiktok_profiles
704.6K views·246.2K engagementShort video
No caption on file
Open the postbrightdata:web_data_tiktok_profiles
1.3M views·263.9K engagementShort video
No caption on file
Open the postbrightdata:web_data_tiktok_profiles
1M views·213.2K engagementShort video
No caption on file
Open the postbrightdata:web_data_tiktok_profiles
Price
Price
—
No price on file: this creator has not set a rate card, and the record holds no deal to read one from. Nothing here supports an estimate, so we do not show one.
History
@nastyblaq
- 4,300,000
Every observation is kept; nothing here is overwritten.