Chidiebere Ibe

  • Contact seen
Basic profileother

@ebereillustrate on Instagram · last 90 days

  • Followers144.1K
  • Growth—
  • Avg views—
  • Avg engagement220.1
  • Eng. rate0.15%
  • Posts / month2.3

Reach out

2 contact options

Audience

Demographics

Not available

Audience location

Audience locations not supplied
—No locations plotted

—Not supplied

Age

—Not supplied

Gender

—Not supplied

    Languages

    —Not supplied

    Interests

    —Not supplied

    Audience data unavailable.

    Engagement signalsView observed post patterns ↓

    @ebereillustrateInstagram

    7 of 7 posts carry engagement numbers

    • Engagement for the size0.15%below typicalHow this is worked out

      Engagement is below what is typical for an account this size on Instagram.

      Average engagement per post
      220.1
      Followers
      144.1K
      Typical range, low
      0.70%
      Typical range, high
      3.0%

      from 7 postsobserved

      Average likes, comments and shares per post divided by followers, placed against the reference band for this platform and follower size.

    • Followers to following320×typicalHow this is worked out

      Followed by 320× the accounts it follows, as creator accounts usually are.

      Followers
      144.1K
      Following
      451

      observed

      Followers divided by the accounts this one follows, from the latest observation; under 1 is the unusual shape for a creator.

    • Comments per like3.9%typicalHow this is worked out

      Comments per like are typical (3.9%).

      Comments, summed
      58
      Likes, summed
      1.5K
      Typical range, low
      0.50%
      Typical range, high
      10%

      from 7 postsobserved

      Comments divided by likes, summed across the posts in the period where both were observed.

    • Short-video reach—not knownHow this is worked out

      Not enough observed posts to say

      Average views per short video
      —
      Followers
      144.1K

      observed

      Average views on short videos in the period divided by followers, against the reference band for this platform.

    • Posting rhythmVariation between posts0.1 daysbelow typicalHow this is worked out

      Posting rhythm is steadier than typical: gaps vary by only 0.1 days around a 1.0 days average.

      Average gap between posts
      1.0 days
      Spread of the gaps
      0.1 days

      from 7 postsobserved

      The spread (standard deviation) of the gaps between consecutive posts in the period, in days; the band compares that spread with the average gap.

    • Posts with numbers100%typicalHow this is worked out

      Engagement numbers were observed on 7 of 7 posts (100%).

      Posts with an engagement number
      7
      Posts in the period
      7

      from 7 postsobserved

      The share of posts in the period on which at least one engagement number was observed — how much of the record the rows above are reading.

    About these signals

    Six things we can work out from the numbers on file for the last 90 days, each set against a published reference range. A band is a comparison, not a grade: there is no score here, no fake-follower percentage. Audience demographics, when supplied, are shown separately. How the ranges were chosen.

    Formats

    @ebereillustrate

    FormatPostsShareAvg viewsEng. rate
    Carousel686%—0.17%
    Short video114%—0.05%

    Posts

    6 posts

    A little navigation around our library! 🎉

We aim for this to be the one-stop diverse digital library for medical illustrations and animations across ALL specialties. 

With the goal: To Improve Learning and To Improve Outcomes For Patients!

💻Check out: 🔗 www.projectkreate.com

And in my BIO. 

📍Start now, then make it better.Short video
    @ebereillustrate

    A little navigation around our library! 🎉 We aim for this to be the one-stop diverse digital library for medical illustrations and animations across ALL specialties. With the goal: To Improve Learning and To Improve Outcomes For Patients! 💻Check out: 🔗 www.projectkreate.com And in my BIO. 📍Start now, then make it better.

    Views
    —
    Engagement
    77
    It’s live!!! 

I want to thank the Almighty God for the wisdom and idea to bring this to live. 

This started as a quiet frustration: opening a textbook, an atlas, or a slide deck and not seeing the patients actually in front of us. Every rash, every rendering, defaulted to one skin tone, as if that were the only way disease ever presented.

I also thought, how can we better represent conditions that cannot necessarily be illustrated, and people feel unseen. So, we created a storytelling medical animation. 

That frustration became a sketch. The sketch became a question: what if the reference material itself were the problem, not a footnote to fix later but the actual gap costing people their diagnoses? So the sketch became research. The research became a process: reference-gathering, clinical review, and revision after revision, because “close enough” isn’t good enough when your image might be the only one a clinician has ever seen of a condition on skin like their patient’s.

Here’s what that gap actually costs. Black patients diagnosed with melanoma have a 5-year survival rate of roughly 70%, compared to over 90% for white patients. The disease itself isn’t more aggressive; that gap all but disappears once you control for stage at diagnosis. 

The real driver is late detection: nearly half of Black patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage melanoma, compared to about a fifth of white patients, in part because clinicians are trained to recognize what disease looks like on one skin tone and are rarely shown the rest.

That’s not a rare edge case. That’s the entire reason this library exists.

None of this happens without support – deep thanks to the Termeer Institute and to our partners at the International Centre for Genetic Disease (iCGD), Harvard Medical School, for backing this from the start, long before there was anything to show for it.

And to my team Gift Wilfred, God’sgift, Edward, Kunda, Samuel, Idiongo.

Today, it’s not a sketch, and it’s not a promise. It’s real, it’s live, and it’s ready for the students and clinicians who need to see the full picture, not just the easiest version of it.

Please follow us @project_kreateCarousel
    @ebereillustrate

    It’s live!!! I want to thank the Almighty God for the wisdom and idea to bring this to live. This started as a quiet frustration: opening a textbook, an atlas, or a slide deck and not seeing the patients actually in front of us. Every rash, every rendering, defaulted to one skin tone, as if that were the only way disease ever presented. I also thought, how can we better represent conditions that cannot necessarily be illustrated, and people feel unseen. So, we created a storytelling medical animation. That frustration became a sketch. The sketch became a question: what if the reference material itself were the problem, not a footnote to fix later but the actual gap costing people their diagnoses? So the sketch became research. The research became a process: reference-gathering, clinical review, and revision after revision, because “close enough” isn’t good enough when your image might be the only one a clinician has ever seen of a condition on skin like their patient’s. Here’s what that gap actually costs. Black patients diagnosed with melanoma have a 5-year survival rate of roughly 70%, compared to over 90% for white patients. The disease itself isn’t more aggressive; that gap all but disappears once you control for stage at diagnosis. The real driver is late detection: nearly half of Black patients are diagnosed with advanced-stage melanoma, compared to about a fifth of white patients, in part because clinicians are trained to recognize what disease looks like on one skin tone and are rarely shown the rest. That’s not a rare edge case. That’s the entire reason this library exists. None of this happens without support – deep thanks to the Termeer Institute and to our partners at the International Centre for Genetic Disease (iCGD), Harvard Medical School, for backing this from the start, long before there was anything to show for it. And to my team Gift Wilfred, God’sgift, Edward, Kunda, Samuel, Idiongo. Today, it’s not a sketch, and it’s not a promise. It’s real, it’s live, and it’s ready for the students and clinicians who need to see the full picture, not just the easiest version of it. Please follow us @project_kreate

    Views
    —
    Engagement
    136
    My works have been featured by CNN, Forbes, Good Morning America, TED, Harvard Medical School and other notable mainstream media. 

Not because it’s pretty, but because it’s necessary. Clinical education has had a representation gap for a long time, and closing it matters enough that people far outside medicine have taken notice.

We’re proud of that. 

But honestly, the part we’re most excited about is simpler: tomorrow, this stops being something people write about, and starts being something you can actually use.

Tomorrow, it’s yours!!Carousel
    @ebereillustrate

    My works have been featured by CNN, Forbes, Good Morning America, TED, Harvard Medical School and other notable mainstream media. Not because it’s pretty, but because it’s necessary. Clinical education has had a representation gap for a long time, and closing it matters enough that people far outside medicine have taken notice. We’re proud of that. But honestly, the part we’re most excited about is simpler: tomorrow, this stops being something people write about, and starts being something you can actually use. Tomorrow, it’s yours!!

    Views
    —
    Engagement
    251
    Every illustration in this library starts as research, not a sketch.

Before a single line gets drawn, there’s reference-gathering, clinical consultation, and a deep research about how a condition actually presents across skin tones — not just the version that’s easiest to find in existing textbooks. Then comes the sketch. Then the revisions. Then clinical review, again.

It’s slower this way. It’s also the only way to make something clinicians can actually trust.

This is the process behind every piece in the library. 

 In 2 days, you get to see where it leads.Carousel
    @ebereillustrate

    Every illustration in this library starts as research, not a sketch. Before a single line gets drawn, there’s reference-gathering, clinical consultation, and a deep research about how a condition actually presents across skin tones — not just the version that’s easiest to find in existing textbooks. Then comes the sketch. Then the revisions. Then clinical review, again. It’s slower this way. It’s also the only way to make something clinicians can actually trust. This is the process behind every piece in the library. In 2 days, you get to see where it leads.

    Views
    —
    Engagement
    263
    First real look at what’s coming!

This is Molar Pregnancy rendered the way it should actually presents, not the way it’s always been drawn. 

Every detail has been through review, because “close enough” isn’t good enough when someone might use this as their only reference point.

This is “one” piece of the library.

There’s a lot more where this came from and in 3 days, all of it is yours.

Please give us a follow @project_kreateCarousel
    @ebereillustrate

    First real look at what’s coming! This is Molar Pregnancy rendered the way it should actually presents, not the way it’s always been drawn. Every detail has been through review, because “close enough” isn’t good enough when someone might use this as their only reference point. This is “one” piece of the library. There’s a lot more where this came from and in 3 days, all of it is yours. Please give us a follow @project_kreate

    Views
    —
    Engagement
    460
    I got tired of opening a textbook and not seeing diverse patients in it.

Every clinical illustration I study from, every atlas I flip through, shows the same default: light skin, every time. Rashes, lesions, cyanosis, jaundice, etc — all rendered the way they present on one skin tone, as if that’s the only way they present at all.

That’s not a small oversight. A finding that’s textbook-obvious on light skin can be genuinely hard to catch on melanin-rich skin if you’ve never been shown what it looks like there. That gap isn’t cosmetic — it’s diagnostic. It delays care. It costs people.

So we set out to build something different!

Coming in 5 days!!Carousel
    @ebereillustrate

    I got tired of opening a textbook and not seeing diverse patients in it. Every clinical illustration I study from, every atlas I flip through, shows the same default: light skin, every time. Rashes, lesions, cyanosis, jaundice, etc — all rendered the way they present on one skin tone, as if that’s the only way they present at all. That’s not a small oversight. A finding that’s textbook-obvious on light skin can be genuinely hard to catch on melanin-rich skin if you’ve never been shown what it looks like there. That gap isn’t cosmetic — it’s diagnostic. It delays care. It costs people. So we set out to build something different! Coming in 5 days!!

    Views
    —
    Engagement
    237

    Price

    Price

    —

    Pricing unavailable.

    History

    @ebereillustrate

    1. 144,147