CreebHills | Nigerian Celebrity News, Fashion, Music and Sports

Basic profilenews

@creebhills on Telegram · last 90 days

  • Followers335
  • Growth+6
  • Avg views18.8
  • Avg engagement—
  • Eng. rate—
  • Posts / month80.7

Reach out

Contact options

No public contact on file. Social profiles are linked above.

Audience

Demographics

Not available

Audience location

Audience locations not supplied
—No locations plotted

—Not supplied

Age

—Not supplied

Gender

—Not supplied

    Languages

    —Not supplied

    Interests

    —Not supplied

    Audience data unavailable.

    Engagement signalsView observed post patterns ↓

    @creebhillsTelegram

    0 of 200 posts carry engagement numbers

    • Engagement for the size—not knownHow this is worked out

      Not enough observed posts to say

      Average engagement per post
      —
      Followers
      335

      observed

      Average likes, comments and shares per post divided by followers, placed against the reference band for this platform and follower size.

    • Followers to following—not knownHow this is worked out

      The following count was never observed, so there is no ratio to read.

      Followers
      335
      Following
      —

      observed

      Followers divided by the accounts this one follows, from the latest observation; under 1 is the unusual shape for a creator.

    • Comments per like—not knownHow this is worked out

      Not enough observed posts to say

      Comments, summed
      —
      Likes, summed
      —

      not observed yet

      Comments divided by likes, summed across the posts in the period where both were observed.

    • Short-video reach—not knownHow this is worked out

      Not enough observed posts to say

      Average views per short video
      —
      Followers
      335

      observed

      Average views on short videos in the period divided by followers, against the reference band for this platform.

    • Posting rhythmVariation between posts0.6 daysabove typicalHow this is worked out

      Posting comes in bursts: gaps vary by 0.6 days around a 0.2 days average.

      Average gap between posts
      0.2 days
      Spread of the gaps
      0.6 days

      from 200 postsobserved

      The spread (standard deviation) of the gaps between consecutive posts in the period, in days; the band compares that spread with the average gap.

    • Posts with numbers0.00%below typicalHow this is worked out

      Engagement numbers were observed on only 0 of 200 posts (0.00%), so the rows above read a thin sample.

      Posts with an engagement number
      0
      Posts in the period
      200

      from 200 postsobserved

      The share of posts in the period on which at least one engagement number was observed — how much of the record the rows above are reading.

    Limited post data

    Fewer than 5 posts with engagement numbers in the last 90 days, so the signals read from posts say so rather than guess. Widen the period to read more.

    About these signals

    Six things we can work out from the numbers on file for the last 90 days, each set against a published reference range. A band is a comparison, not a grade: there is no score here, no fake-follower percentage. Audience demographics, when supplied, are shown separately. How the ranges were chosen.

    Formats

    @creebhills

    FormatPostsShareAvg viewsEng. rate
    Text242100%18.8—

    Posts

    10 posts

    Price

    Price

    —

    Pricing unavailable.

    History

    @creebhills

    1. 335
    2. 335
    3. 335
    4. 335
    5. 335
    6. 335
    7. 335
    8. 335
    9. 334
    10. 334
    11. 334
    12. 333
    13. 332
    14. 332
    15. 334
    16. 334
    17. 333
    18. 334
    19. 333
    20. 333
    21. 333
    22. 333
    23. 332
    24. 332
    25. 332
    26. 333
    27. 333
    28. 335
    29. 335
    30. 334
    31. 334
    32. 333
    33. 334
    34. 333
    35. 332
    36. 331
    37. 331
    38. 330
    39. 331
    40. 330
    41. 329
    42. 329
    43. 329